Innovation is often seen as the driving force that propels industries forward. Yet, in the modular and offsite construction sectors, many promising innovations face resistance from factory owners and managers. This reluctance to embrace change has long baffled innovators, especially when their products or services seem to offer clear benefits. So why is it that so many offsite construction innovations fail to gain traction in factories?
The truth is, resistance to innovation in this sector is not just about the technology itself—it’s deeply rooted in the culture, risk tolerance, and financial realities of factory owners and managers. This article explores the key reasons behind this resistance and offers actionable insights for innovators to overcome these roadblocks.
The ‘No Need to Change’ Attitude
One of the most pervasive obstacles that innovators face in offsite construction is the deeply entrenched “no need to change” mindset. Many factory owners and managers are comfortable with their current processes and are hesitant to disrupt what they perceive as a smooth operation.
Modular factories, especially those that have been operating for decades, often rely on well-established systems that have proven successful. These managers see no immediate need to introduce unfamiliar processes or technologies. From their perspective, the risks outweigh the potential benefits.
Factory owners and managers are also acutely aware of how change can affect production timelines. Many fear that experimenting with a new innovation, whether it’s a product or process, could lead to delays, mistakes, or miscommunications that disrupt the entire workflow. In a fast-paced industry where every minute counts, downtime is costly—and most factories prefer to avoid it altogether.
However, innovators must understand that this reluctance often stems from a desire for stability. Factory owners and managers have built their businesses on consistency, and any disruption to that consistency is viewed as a threat. For innovators to successfully engage with these decision-makers, they must first acknowledge this mindset and demonstrate how their innovations can enhance stability rather than disrupt it.
“We Can’t Afford to Try Your Product or Service“
Cost is one of the most frequently cited reasons for rejecting innovation. Factory owners and managers often operate on thin margins, and the upfront cost of adopting new products or services can seem prohibitive. Even when an innovation promises long-term savings, the initial investment can be a tough sell.
In many cases, factory owners simply don’t have the budget to experiment with unproven technologies. Their capital is tied up in maintaining equipment, paying labor, and managing day-to-day expenses. The idea of spending on something new, especially if it doesn’t provide an immediate return, feels like a gamble that many aren’t willing to take.
Compounding this issue is the fact that many factory owners feel they lack the financial safety net to recover if the innovation fails. The risk of failure is too high—especially if the new process, material, or tool causes production delays or doesn’t deliver on its promised efficiencies. Even a short period of downtime or reduced output can have a significant financial impact, making any perceived risk difficult to justify.
Innovators can address this by offering flexible pricing models or phased implementation plans. By reducing the financial risk to factory owners and managers, they can make it easier for factories to experiment with new products and services without feeling they are putting their entire operation at risk.
Skepticism About Builder and Developer Buy-In
Factory owners and managers also face pressure from their clients—builders and developers—who may be just as skeptical about adopting new methods as the factories themselves. Even if an innovation is successful within the factory, there is no guarantee that builders or developers will be willing to accept the change.
Builders and developers often have their own set of preferences, many of which are shaped by years of working with traditional methods. Factory owners are acutely aware of this and often hesitate to adopt innovations unless they are certain their clients will be on board. After all, a factory’s success depends largely on its ability to meet the needs of its clients.
This creates a tricky situation where even the most promising innovation can be stifled by a lack of interest from the broader construction ecosystem. Factory owners don’t want to waste time or money on something that builders won’t accept—and builders, in turn, may be slow to embrace changes from the factory.
For innovators, this means that the battle for acceptance doesn’t end at the factory door. They must also engage with builders and developers to demonstrate how their innovations can improve project outcomes. By building relationships throughout the construction value chain, innovators can create a more compelling case for adoption.
The ‘Juice Isn’t Worth the Squeeze’ Mentality
Even when an innovation has clear benefits, factory owners and managers may feel that the effort required to implement it simply isn’t worth the reward. This “juice isn’t worth the squeeze” mentality is common in industries where established processes have been refined over many years.
Offsite construction factories often have complex workflows that are difficult to adjust. A new innovation might promise increased efficiency, but if the process of integrating that innovation is too cumbersome, it can feel more like a burden than a benefit. Many factory managers would rather stick with the status quo than invest the time, energy, and resources required to overhaul their systems.
In these cases, innovators must focus on simplifying their solutions. They need to show factory owners how the innovation can be implemented with minimal disruption. Offering hands-on support during the transition period can also make a big difference. When factory owners feel that they have a partner guiding them through the process, they are more likely to embrace change.
Overcoming Roadblocks: What Innovators Can Do
To successfully break through the resistance found in modular and offsite construction factories, innovators must approach the industry with empathy and strategy. Here are key steps that can help overcome common roadblocks:
Understand the Factory’s Pain Points: Innovators should take the time to understand the specific challenges faced by factory owners and managers. Instead of leading with the benefits of the innovation, start by addressing the problems it solves.
Demonstrate Low-Risk Implementation: Present case studies, pilot programs, or incremental adoption plans to lower the perceived risk. Showing that the innovation has worked elsewhere and that it can be gradually integrated will help ease concerns.
Engage the Entire Value Chain: Innovators must collaborate with not only the factories but also the builders and developers they serve. By creating a value proposition for the entire construction ecosystem, innovators can foster a greater sense of acceptance.
Provide Financial Flexibility: Offering innovative pricing models, such as pay-as-you-go or leasing options, can make the financial barrier less daunting for factories operating on tight margins.
Support Through Transition: Providing hands-on support, training, and resources during the transition phase will help mitigate any fear of disruption. Innovators need to assure factories that they won’t be left to navigate the changes alone.
Promote Long-Term Value: While the upfront cost may seem high, innovators should emphasize the long-term value of their solutions. Highlighting cost savings, efficiency improvements, and competitive advantages over time can help sway hesitant decision-makers.\
Innovating in offsite construction is an uphill battle, but it’s not impossible. By addressing the concerns of factory owners and managers head-on, building relationships throughout the construction value chain, and offering low-risk, high-value solutions, innovators can break through the resistance that has long stifled progress in this industry. The key is to approach with empathy, understand the culture of caution, and offer solutions that align with the practical realities of factory operations.
.
